In relation to F.I.R., which of the following statements is not correct?
Verified Answer
A. It is not a substantive evidence
B. It merely marks the begining of the investigation
C. It cannot be used as a previous statement for any purpose
D. The informant need not be an eye witness
Explanation:
An FIR can be used as a previous statement for corroboration (Section 157, Evidence Act) or contradiction (Section 145, Evidence Act) of the informant. Therefore, the statement that it cannot be used for any purpose is incorrect.