Assertion (A): Part III and Part IV of the Constitution of India are supplementary to each other. Reasons (R): Fundamental Rights are enforceable.
Explanation:
Assertion (A) is true. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) are not antithetical but are complementary and supplementary to each other, aiming to achieve social and economic democracy. Reason (R) is also true. Fundamental Rights are justiciable and enforceable in courts of law, unlike Directive Principles. However, the enforceability of Fundamental Rights does not explain *why* Part III and Part IV are supplementary; their supplementary nature stems from their common objective of establishing a welfare state and social justice.