Match List I with List II and select the correct answer using the code given below the list: List I A. Vineet Narain v. Union of India B. Kanu Sanyal v. D.M., Darjeeling C. Roopa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra D. Chandra Kumar Case List II
- Curative petition
- Habeas Corpus
- Continuing Mandamus
- Administrative Tribunals
Verified Answer
A. (A) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
B. (B) A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
C. (C) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
D. (D) A-1, B-4, C-3, D-2
Explanation:
A. Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1998) is known for the concept of 'Continuing Mandamus' (3). B. Kanu Sanyal v. D.M., Darjeeling (1973) is a landmark case defining the scope of the writ of Habeas Corpus (2). C. Roopa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002) established the 'Curative Petition' (1). D. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) dealt with the judicial review powers of High Courts over 'Administrative Tribunals' (4). Thus, the correct match is A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4.