In which of the following, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that in a case arising from Negotiable Instruments Act, successive sentences may be directed to run concurrently if both transactions are part of single transaction?
Verified Answer
A. (2010) 5 SCC 663, Damodar S. Prahbu v. Sayed Babalal H.
B. (2016) 3 SCC 1, Done Ayengia v. State of Assam & Ors.
C. (2009) 1 SCC 706, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. & Anr. v. Rajiv Dubey.
D. (2016) 10 SCC 761, Shyam Pal v. Dayawati Besoya & Ors.
Explanation:
In the case of Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663, the Supreme Court discussed various aspects of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, including the possibility of concurrent sentences for multiple dishonoured cheques arising from a single transaction.