Anthropology optional 2017 Paper II

Discuss the emergence, salient features and limitations of Tribal sub-plan.

Verified Answer

The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) strategy emerged in India during the Fifth Five-Year Plan (1974-79) as a targeted approach to address the specific development needs and accelerate the socio-economic upliftment of Scheduled Tribes (STs). Prior to TSP, general development programs often failed to adequately benefit tribal communities due to their unique socio-cultural context, geographical isolation, and specific challenges. The TSP was conceived to ensure a more focused and equitable allocation of resources and implementation of programs for tribal development.

Emergence: The realization that a 'trickle-down' approach was not working for tribal populations, coupled with increasing awareness of their persistent backwardness and exploitation, led to the formulation of the TSP. The strategy aimed to bridge the development gap between STs and the general population, protect them from exploitation, and improve their quality of life. It was based on the principle of 'area development with a focus on the tribal population,' identifying specific tribal majority areas for concentrated development efforts.

Salient Features:

  1. Area-Specific Approach: TSP identifies 'Tribal Sub-Plan Areas' (ITDPs - Integrated Tribal Development Projects/Agencies) which are contiguous areas with a significant concentration of ST population (usually 50% or more in a block or district). For scattered tribal populations, Modified Area Development Approach (MADA) pockets and Clusters are identified.
  2. Earmarking of Funds: A key feature is the earmarking of funds from the general sector outlays of both central and state governments. Each ministry/department is mandated to allocate a certain percentage of its budget (at least in proportion to the ST population in the state) for tribal development schemes under TSP. These funds are non-divertible.
  3. Integrated Development: TSP aims for holistic development, covering various sectors such as agriculture, education, health, infrastructure, skill development, and protection against exploitation. It emphasizes a multi-sectoral and integrated approach rather than isolated interventions.
  4. Protective and Developmental Aspects: The strategy combines protective measures (e.g., against land alienation, indebtedness, exploitation by moneylenders) with developmental initiatives to ensure both their well-being and empowerment.
  5. Decentralized Planning: It promotes decentralized planning and implementation, with ITDPs/ITDAs playing a crucial role in formulating and executing schemes tailored to local needs.

Limitations:

  1. Fund Diversion and Underutilization: Despite the non-divertible clause, funds allocated under TSP are often diverted to general sector schemes or remain unutilized due to bureaucratic hurdles, lack of capacity, or political will. This significantly undermines the effectiveness of the plan.
  2. Lack of Specificity and Monitoring: Many schemes under TSP are generic and not specifically tailored to the unique needs and cultural contexts of diverse tribal groups. There is often inadequate monitoring and evaluation of the actual impact of these schemes on tribal communities.
  3. Top-Down Approach: Despite the emphasis on decentralized planning, the process often remains top-down, with limited participation of tribal communities in decision-making, leading to schemes that may not align with their priorities or traditional practices.
  4. Weak Institutional Mechanisms: The institutional framework for TSP implementation, including ITDPs, often suffers from staff shortages, lack of technical expertise, and coordination issues among various departments.
  5. Failure to Address Root Causes: While TSP aims to address exploitation, it often falls short in tackling the structural issues of land alienation, forest rights, and market exploitation effectively, which are fundamental to tribal well-being.

In conclusion, while the Tribal Sub-Plan was a significant step towards focused tribal development, its effectiveness has been hampered by implementation gaps, fund diversion, and a persistent top-down approach, necessitating reforms to ensure genuine empowerment and sustainable development for tribal communities.