उच्चतम न्यायालय एवं उच्च न्यायालयों के न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति तथा उच्च न्यायालयों के न्यायाधीशों के स्थानान्तरण की प्रक्रिया की विवेचना भारत के उच्चतम न्यायालय के विनिश्चयों के आलोक में कीजिए । संवैधानिक उपबंधों का भी सन्दर्भ दीजिए । Discuss the procedure for the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts and transfer of judges of the High Courts in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court of India. Also refer to the constitutional provisions.
-
Core Legal Answer & Context: The procedure for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts, and the transfer of High Court judges, has evolved significantly through judicial pronouncements, particularly the 'Three Judges Cases.' Initially, the executive had a more dominant role, but the Supreme Court's interpretations have firmly established the primacy of the judiciary (the Collegium system) in these matters to safeguard judicial independence. The Collegium, comprising the Chief Justice of India and senior-most judges, recommends names for appointment and transfer, which the executive then processes. While the executive has a role in vetting and can raise objections, the Collegium's reiterated recommendations are generally binding.
-
Relevant Statutes and Sections:
- Article 124(2): Deals with the appointment of Supreme Court judges. States that every judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President after consultation with such of the judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary. In the case of appointment of a judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted.
- Article 217(1): Deals with the appointment of High Court judges. States that every judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the State, and, in the case of appointment of a judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of the High Court.
- Article 222(1): Deals with the transfer of a High Court judge. States that the President may, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, transfer a judge from one High Court to any other High Court.
- Important Landmark Cases:
- S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (First Judges Case, 1981): The Supreme Court held that the word 'consultation' in Articles 124 and 217 did not mean 'concurrence.' The executive's opinion was given primacy, allowing the President (acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers) to have the final say in appointments.
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (Second Judges Case, 1993): This landmark judgment overturned the First Judges Case. It held that 'consultation' effectively meant 'concurrence' and introduced the 'Collegium System.' For Supreme Court appointments, the CJI's recommendation, made after consulting two senior-most judges, was deemed binding. For High Court appointments, the CJI would consult two senior-most SC judges and the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court.
- In re Special Reference 1 of 1998 (Third Judges Case, 1998): This case clarified and expanded the Collegium. For Supreme Court appointments, the CJI must consult a Collegium of four senior-most Supreme Court judges. For High Court appointments and transfers, the CJI must consult a Collegium of two senior-most Supreme Court judges. The recommendations of the Collegium are binding on the President.
- National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Case (2015): The Supreme Court struck down the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014, which sought to replace the Collegium system with the NJAC. The Court held that the NJAC Act undermined judicial independence, which is a basic feature of the Constitution, thereby reaffirming the Collegium system.
- Clear Conclusion: The appointment and transfer of judges in India are primarily governed by the Collegium system, a judicial innovation born out of the Supreme Court's interpretation of constitutional provisions. This system, established to ensure judicial independence and insulate appointments from political interference, gives primacy to the Chief Justice of India and senior-most judges in the selection and transfer process. While debates persist regarding its transparency and accountability, the Collegium remains the established mechanism, having been repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court as essential for maintaining the independence of the judiciary.