Core Legal Answer & Context: The statement accurately encapsulates the fundamental characteristics of tortious liability, distinguishing it from other branches of law like contract law. Tort law deals with civil wrongs that cause a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. The essence lies in a legally imposed duty, a breach of that duty, and resulting unliquidated damages.

Relevant Statutes and Sections: Tort law in India is largely uncodified, primarily based on common law principles and judicial precedents. Therefore, there are no specific statutes or sections that define tortious liability in this general manner. However, specific torts (e.g., negligence, defamation, nuisance) are recognized and enforced through judicial pronouncements.

Important Landmark Cases:

1. Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932): This seminal House of Lords case established the modern concept of negligence and the 'neighbour principle'. Lord Atkin famously stated that one must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which one can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure one's neighbour. This case perfectly illustrates a duty 'fixed by law' and owed 'towards persons generally'.
2. Rylands v. Fletcher (1868): This case established the principle of strict liability for the escape of dangerous things from one's land, further demonstrating a duty imposed by law, irrespective of fault, to prevent harm to others.

Commentary on the Statement:

1. "Tortious liability arises from breach of duty primarily fixed by the law": Unlike contractual duties, which arise from agreements between specific parties, duties in tort are imposed by the general law. These are duties owed to society at large, or to a class of persons, to refrain from certain conduct that could cause harm. For instance, every driver has a legal duty of care to other road users, and every person has a duty not to defame another. This duty is not created by agreement but by the legal system itself.
2. "This duty is towards persons generally": This refers to a 'duty in rem' (against the world at large), as opposed to a 'duty in personam' (against a specific person or persons) found in contract law. The duty is not owed to a particular individual but to all individuals who might foreseeably be affected by one's actions or inactions. For example, the duty not to commit negligence is owed to anyone who might be a 'neighbour' in the legal sense.
3. "its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages": When a legally imposed duty is breached, and this breach causes harm, the injured party can seek a remedy. The primary remedy in tort is damages. 'Unliquidated damages' means that the amount of compensation is not pre-determined or fixed by the parties in advance (as in liquidated damages in contract). Instead, the court assesses the damages based on the actual loss suffered by the claimant, which can include economic losses (e.g., medical expenses, loss of earnings) and non-economic losses (e.g., pain and suffering, loss of amenity). The court has discretion in determining the quantum of these damages.

Clear Conclusion: The statement provides a concise and accurate definition of tortious liability. It highlights that torts are civil wrongs arising from the breach of a general duty imposed by law, owed to the public at large, and remedied by monetary compensation whose amount is determined by the court based on the actual harm suffered. This distinguishes tort law from contract law, where duties arise from agreement and damages may be pre-agreed, and from criminal law, which focuses on offenses against the state and punishment.