The statement that "The General Assembly of the United Nations cannot be called World Parliament" accurately reflects the fundamental differences between the UN General Assembly (GA) and a national parliament. While the GA serves as the main deliberative, policymaking, and representative organ of the United Nations, its powers and functions are significantly constrained, preventing it from operating as a true legislative body for the world.

Key Limitations of the General Assembly:

1. Non-Binding Resolutions: Unlike national parliaments whose laws are legally binding on citizens, resolutions adopted by the General Assembly are generally recommendatory in nature. They carry significant moral and political weight, contributing to the development of international law and norms, but they are not legally enforceable on member states (with exceptions for internal UN matters like budgetary decisions). This lack of binding authority is the most significant distinction from a parliament.

2. Lack of Enforcement Power: The GA possesses no direct means to enforce its resolutions or decisions. Enforcement mechanisms, particularly concerning international peace and security, are primarily vested in the Security Council, which has the power to impose sanctions or authorize the use of force.

3. No Legislative Authority: The GA cannot create international law in the same way a parliament creates national law. While it can initiate studies, make recommendations, and adopt international conventions and treaties, these instruments only become legally binding on states that ratify them. The GA itself does not have the power to legislate for the global community.

4. Sovereignty of Member States: The UN is an organization of sovereign states. Member states retain their sovereignty and are not compelled to abide by GA resolutions against their will. This principle of state sovereignty inherently limits the GA's ability to act as a supranational legislative body.

5. Primary Role of the Security Council: The UN Charter grants primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security to the Security Council. This often means that the most critical and urgent global issues are addressed by the Security Council, whose resolutions are legally binding, thereby overshadowing the GA's influence in these areas.

6. Budgetary Dependence: The GA's operations and the UN's overall budget are dependent on contributions from member states. This financial reliance can sometimes limit its independence and capacity to undertake ambitious initiatives.

7. Consensus and Bloc Voting: While the GA operates on the principle of one state, one vote, decisions often reflect the interests of political blocs rather than a unified global will. This can lead to resolutions that, while passed, may lack broad support for implementation or face significant opposition from powerful states.

Despite these limitations, the General Assembly remains an indispensable forum for multilateral diplomacy, global dialogue, and the articulation of international norms. It provides a platform for all member states, regardless of their power, to voice concerns, debate critical issues, and contribute to the development of international cooperation and law. However, its structure and mandate clearly differentiate it from a 'World Parliament' with legislative and enforcement powers.