The statement accurately reflects a fundamental aspect of human rights implementation. Historically, the concept of state sovereignty often implied that how a state treated its own citizens was an internal matter. However, with the evolution of international human rights law, particularly since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948, human rights have become a legitimate concern of the international community. This shift necessitates a profound change in the conduct of states.

Implementing human rights requires states to move beyond mere declarations and actively transform their policies, laws, and administrative practices. This involves several key areas:

1. Legal Reforms: States must enact domestic laws that incorporate international human rights standards, repeal discriminatory legislation, and establish independent judicial and quasi-judicial bodies for redressal.
2. Policy and Administrative Changes: Governments need to formulate policies that promote and protect human rights across all sectors, from education and healthcare to law enforcement and economic development. This includes training public officials, police, and military personnel on human rights principles.
3. Resource Allocation: Fulfilling economic, social, and cultural rights (e.g., right to education, health, adequate standard of living) requires significant resource allocation and equitable distribution, often necessitating a reorientation of national budgets.
4. Accountability Mechanisms: States must establish effective mechanisms for accountability, allowing individuals to seek remedies for human rights violations. This includes independent courts, national human rights institutions, and accessible complaint procedures.
5. Transparency and Participation: Good governance, transparency, and public participation in decision-making are crucial for human rights. States must ensure that citizens have the right to information and can participate in processes that affect their lives.
6. International Cooperation: States are expected to cooperate with international human rights bodies, submit periodic reports, and allow monitoring by international mechanisms.

Challenges to this transformation include state resistance due to sovereignty concerns, lack of political will, capacity deficits, and competing national interests. Nevertheless, the ongoing process of human rights implementation fundamentally redefines the relationship between the state and its citizens, moving towards a model where state power is exercised within a framework of universal human dignity and rights.