Sometimes we visualize that SAARC's efforts come to halt because of various impediments to regional cooperation." Elaborate with reasonable examples of impediments.
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), established in 1985, was envisioned to promote economic and social development through regional cooperation. However, its efforts have frequently stalled due to a multitude of impediments, primarily rooted in the complex geopolitical landscape of South Asia.
The most significant impediment is the India-Pakistan rivalry. The deep-seated historical animosity, territorial disputes (Kashmir), and cross-border terrorism have consistently overshadowed SAARC's agenda. For example, the 2016 SAARC Summit in Islamabad was effectively boycotted by India and several other member states following the Uri attack, leading to its indefinite postponement. This bilateral tension often paralyzes collective decision-making, as SAARC operates on the principle of unanimity.
Bilateral disputes among other member states also hinder progress. Issues like water sharing disputes between India and Bangladesh, or ethnic tensions affecting relations between Sri Lanka and India, can spill over into regional forums. Lack of political will and trust among member states is another major hurdle. Despite agreements, implementation often lags due to a lack of genuine commitment to regional integration over national interests. This is evident in the slow progress of initiatives like the SAARC Free Trade Area (SAFTA), which has not fully realized its potential due to non-tariff barriers and protectionist policies.
Asymmetry in size and economic power, with India being the dominant player, sometimes creates apprehension among smaller neighbors, leading to concerns about Indian hegemony. This can make smaller states hesitant to fully commit to regional projects. Institutional weaknesses within SAARC, including a cumbersome decision-making process and limited funding, also contribute to its ineffectiveness. Finally, external influences and the differing strategic alignments of member states (e.g., Nepal and Sri Lanka's growing ties with China) can further complicate regional consensus and cooperation, diverting focus from SAARC's core objectives.