Political Science and IR Optional 2018 Paper I

Implementation of GST and NEET is a major challenge to Indian federalism.

Verified Answer

The implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) has indeed posed significant challenges to the cooperative federal structure of India, primarily by centralizing powers traditionally held by the states.

GST and Federalism: GST, introduced in 2017, unified a multitude of indirect taxes under a single regime. While aimed at creating a common national market and simplifying taxation, it significantly curtailed the fiscal autonomy of states. States lost their independent power to levy various taxes like VAT, excise duty, and entertainment tax, which were crucial sources of revenue. The GST Council, a joint forum of the Centre and states, now makes decisions on tax rates and policies, requiring consensus. While this promotes cooperative federalism, it also means states have less individual control over their fiscal policies and revenue generation, making them more dependent on the Centre for compensation and revenue sharing. This shift has led to concerns about states' financial independence and their ability to tailor tax policies to local needs.

NEET and Federalism: NEET, a common entrance examination for admission to undergraduate and postgraduate medical and dental courses, was introduced to standardize medical education and curb malpractices. However, it encroaches upon the states' constitutional right to regulate education, which falls under the Concurrent List. States traditionally had the authority to conduct their own entrance exams, set admission criteria, and manage their medical colleges. NEET's implementation has raised concerns about: (1) uniformity ignoring regional disparities in educational standards and curricula; (2) language barriers for students from non-English medium schools; (3) the impact on state-specific reservation policies; and (4) the potential erosion of states' control over their health and education infrastructure. States argue that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach undermines their autonomy and ability to cater to local requirements.

In both cases, GST and NEET represent a move towards greater centralization, challenging the delicate balance of power between the Centre and states. While proponents argue for national uniformity and efficiency, critics contend that these measures dilute the federal spirit by reducing states' legislative and fiscal powers, potentially leading to friction and undermining regional diversity.