The statement 'Indian Constitution is a Lawyers' Paradise' was famously made by the British constitutional expert Ivor Jennings. He used this phrase to highlight the intricate, detailed, and legalistic nature of the Indian Constitution, which he believed provided ample scope for legal interpretation and litigation, thereby benefiting lawyers.

Jennings' observation stems from several characteristics of the Indian Constitution. Firstly, it is one of the longest and most comprehensive written constitutions in the world, containing numerous articles, schedules, and amendments. This extensive detail, while aiming for clarity and precision, also creates complexity and potential for varied interpretations.

Secondly, the Constitution's language is highly legalistic, reflecting the fact that many of its framers were legal luminaries. This technical language often requires expert legal knowledge to understand and apply, making lawyers indispensable in constitutional matters.

Thirdly, the Indian Constitution provides for extensive judicial review, allowing courts to scrutinize legislative and executive actions for their constitutionality. This robust role of the judiciary, coupled with the fundamental rights provisions and the 'basic structure' doctrine, frequently leads to constitutional challenges and appeals, creating a fertile ground for legal professionals.

While the detailed nature of the Constitution has ensured stability and provided a clear framework for governance, Jennings' critique points to the potential for excessive litigation and the reliance on legal expertise, which can sometimes make the constitutional process inaccessible to the common person. It underscores the significant role that the legal fraternity plays in the interpretation and evolution of India's constitutional framework.