Political Science and IR Optional 2024 Paper II

Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China?

Verified Answer

The concept of the 'Asian Century' posits that the 21st century will be dominated by Asian politics, culture, and economics, driven primarily by the rise of China and India. While the economic growth and increasing geopolitical influence of several Asian nations, particularly these two giants, lend significant credence to this idea, the growing friction between India and China introduces substantial complexities and challenges to its full realization.

On one hand, the fundamental drivers of the 'Asian Century' remain robust. Asia is home to over half the world's population, boasts some of the fastest-growing economies, and is a hub for innovation and manufacturing. China is already the world's second-largest economy, and India is projected to become the third-largest by mid-century. The sheer scale of their domestic markets, their demographic dividends, and their increasing contributions to global GDP suggest that Asia's economic gravity will continue to pull upwards.

However, the escalating friction between India and China poses a significant threat to the harmonious and cooperative vision often associated with the 'Asian Century'. This friction manifests in several ways:

  1. Border Disputes: Persistent and often violent border standoffs (e.g., Galwan Valley, Doklam) create a climate of mistrust and divert significant resources towards military buildup rather than regional development.
  2. Geopolitical Rivalry: Both nations vie for influence in the Indo-Pacific, Indian Ocean Region, and beyond. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is seen by India as a strategic encirclement, while India's engagement with the QUAD is viewed with suspicion by Beijing.
  3. Economic Competition and Decoupling: While economically intertwined, there's a growing push for economic decoupling, particularly from India's side, due to security concerns and trade imbalances. India has banned numerous Chinese apps and restricted Chinese investments, signaling a desire to reduce economic dependence.
  4. Regional Leadership: Both aspire to be regional and global leaders, leading to competition in multilateral forums and for influence over smaller Asian nations.

This friction can undermine the 'Asian Century' in several ways: it can hinder regional integration and cooperation, create instability that deters investment, force countries to choose sides, and divert focus from common challenges like climate change and poverty. Instead of a cohesive and cooperative rise, the 'Asian Century' might be characterized by intense competition and strategic rivalry, potentially leading to a more fragmented and less stable regional order.

Despite these challenges, the 'Asian Century' might still be feasible, but perhaps in a modified form. It may not be a century of seamless Asian unity, but rather one where Asian powers, including India and China, continue to drive global economic growth and exert significant influence, albeit within a framework of strategic competition. The sheer momentum of their economic trajectories and demographic advantages is difficult to ignore. However, the quality and nature of this 'Asian Century' will be profoundly shaped by how India and China manage their complex and often adversarial relationship. A truly prosperous and peaceful 'Asian Century' would require a significant de-escalation of tensions and a greater emphasis on cooperative mechanisms, which currently appear elusive.